Model Cards / Meta AI

Llama 4 Model Card

model card3,165 words·14 min read·Mar 31, 2026·Source
Summary

Llama 4 Model Card

A 611-word brief of a 3,165-word document. Published by Meta AI. Version dated Mar 31, 2026.
01

What this is

Llama 4 is a collection of natively multimodal AI models developed by Meta, released April 5, 2025, succeeding the Llama 3.x series. The release comprises two models: Llama 4 Scout (17B activated / 109B total parameters, 16 experts) and Llama 4 Maverick (17B activated / 400B total parameters, 128 experts). Both use a mixture-of-experts (MoE) auto-regressive architecture with early fusion for native multimodality. The models are designed for commercial and research use across text, image, and code tasks in multiple languages.

02

Capabilities

Both models accept multilingual text and image input and produce multilingual text and code output across 12 supported languages. Scout offers a 10M-token context window; Maverick offers 1M. On instruction-tuned benchmarks, Maverick scores 69.8 on GPQA Diamond, 80.5 on MMLU Pro, 73.4 on MMMU, and 43.4 pass@1 on LiveCodeBench; Scout scores 57.2 on GPQA Diamond, 74.3 on MMLU Pro, and 69.4 on MMMU. Both models score 94.4 ANLS on DocVQA (test). Knowledge cutoff is August 2024.

03

Evaluation methodology

All reported evaluations were conducted on bf16 models, not quantized checkpoints. Meta built dedicated adversarial evaluation datasets for common use cases (chatbot, visual QA) and evaluated systems composed of Llama models paired with Llama Guard 3 to filter inputs and outputs. Capability-specific benchmarks cover long context, multilingual, coding, and memorization. Recurring red-teaming exercises involve experts in cybersecurity, adversarial machine learning, integrity, and multilingual content from specific geographic markets.

04

Safety testing

Meta evaluated three critical risk areas. For CBRN, expert-designed evaluations assessed whether Llama 4 could "meaningfully increase the capabilities of malicious actors to plan or carry out attacks" using chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive materials. For child safety, a dedicated expert team assessed model outputs, with benchmarks expanded to cover multi-image and multilingual capabilities. For cyber, threat modeling and capability challenges assessed whether Llama 4 could automate attacks or exploit vulnerabilities; Meta reports it finds "that Llama 4 models do not introduce risk plausibly enabling catastrophic cyber outcomes."

05

Mitigations

Model-level safeguards include safety fine-tuning using human-generated and synthetic data, with LLM-based classifiers for data quality control. Meta reduced refusals to benign prompts and retrained tone to remove preachy or moralizing language. At the system level, Meta provides Llama Guard, Prompt Guard, and Code Shield as open-source tools that developers are directed to deploy alongside the model. The reference implementation includes these protections by default. No ASL or FSF tier is referenced in this document.

06

Deployment and access

Llama 4 is released under the Llama 4 Community License Agreement, a custom commercial license. Scout is released as BF16 weights and supports on-the-fly int4 quantization to fit a single H100 GPU; Maverick is released in both BF16 and FP8, with FP8 fitting a single H100 DGX host. Use cases prohibited include violations of applicable law, the Acceptable Use Policy, and deployment in languages or capabilities beyond those explicitly supported. Developers extending use to additional languages or beyond 5 input images bear responsibility for safety testing.

07

Limitations

Meta states that testing "has not covered, nor could it cover, all scenarios" and that Llama 4's "potential outputs cannot be predicted in advance." The model may "produce inaccurate or other objectionable responses to user prompts." Image understanding has been tested for up to 5 input images; use beyond that is at the developer's risk. Pre-training covered approximately 200 languages, but only 12 are officially supported; Meta places responsibility for safe use in additional languages on developers.

08

What's new

Llama 4 introduces the MoE architecture and native multimodality to the Llama family, both absent from Llama 3.x. Scout's 10M-token context window and Maverick's 1M-token window represent a substantial increase over the 128K context available in Llama 3.1 405B. No version changelog or incremental delta entries are provided in this document beyond the transition from the Llama 3 generation.

Generated by Claude sonnet from the cleaned source on Apr 23, 2026. Passages in double quotes are verbatim from the source; other text is neutral paraphrase. For citation, use the original: original document · source SHA 175dda5730b7.

Extracted Evaluations(59 results)

Sort by:0/59 rows fully reproducible (0%)
BenchmarkCategoryStateScoreSetupSource
codingscored
77.6%
pass at 1
3-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
codingscored
74.4%
pass at 1
3-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
codingscored
67.8%
pass at 1
3-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
codingscored
66.4%
pass at 1
3-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ 2024_10_2025_02
codingscored
43.4
pass at 1
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ 2024_10_2025_02
codingscored
33.3
pass at 1
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ 2024_10_2025_02
codingscored
32.8
pass at 1
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ 2024_10_2025_02
codingscored
27.7
pass at 1
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
knowledgescored
85.5%
accuracy
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
knowledgescored
85.2%
accuracy
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
80.5%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
knowledgescored
79.6%
accuracy
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
knowledgescored
79.3%
accuracy
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
74.3%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
73.4%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
68.9%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
62.9%
exact match
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
61.6%
exact match
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
58.2%
exact match
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
53.8%
exact match
5-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
61.2%
exact match
4-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
53.5%
exact match
4-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
50.3%
exact match
4-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
41.6%
exact match
4-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multilingualscored
92.3%
exact match
0-shotAverageinstruction-tunedmissing: method
self-reported
multilingualscored
91.6%
exact match
0-shotAverageinstruction-tunedmissing: method
self-reported
multilingualscored
91.1%
exact match
0-shotAverageinstruction-tunedmissing: method
self-reported
multilingualscored
90.6%
exact match
0-shotAverageinstruction-tunedmissing: method
self-reported
/ test
multimodalscored
94.4
anls
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ test
multimodalscored
94.4
anls
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
91.6
anls
0-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
90.0
relaxed accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
89.4
anls
0-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
88.8
relaxed accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
85.3
relaxed accuracy
0-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
83.4
relaxed accuracy
0-shotpretrainedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
73.7
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
multimodalscored
70.7
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
MTOB/ half_book
otherscored
54.0
chrf
eng->kgvinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ full_book
otherscored
50.8
chrf
eng->kgvinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ full_book
otherscored
46.7
chrf
kgv->enginstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ half_book
otherscored
46.4
chrf
kgv->enginstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ half_book
otherscored
42.2
chrf
eng->kgvinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ full_book
otherscored
39.7
chrf
eng->kgvinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ half_book
otherscored
36.6
chrf
kgv->enginstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
MTOB/ full_book
otherscored
36.3
chrf
kgv->enginstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
TydiQA
otherscored
34.3
f1
1-shotAveragepretrainedmissing: method
self-reported
TydiQA
otherscored
31.7
f1
1-shotAveragepretrainedmissing: method
self-reported
TydiQA
otherscored
31.5
f1
1-shotAveragepretrainedmissing: method
self-reported
TydiQA
otherscored
29.9
f1
1-shotAveragepretrainedmissing: method
self-reported
MLCommons Proof of Concept
othercited
missing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: languagemissing: training state
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
69.8%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
57.2%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
50.5%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
49.0%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
visionscored
73.4%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
visionscored
69.4%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
visionscored
59.6%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
visionscored
52.2%
accuracy
0-shotinstruction-tunedmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported