Model Cards / Google DeepMind

Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card

model card1,529 words·7 min read·Mar 31, 2026·Source
Summary

Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card

A 567-word brief of a 1,529-word document. Published by Google DeepMind. Version dated Mar 31, 2026.
01

What this is

Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model released by Google DeepMind, with its model card published April 15, 2025. It is a member of the Gemini 2.0 series, designed to power agentic systems, and improves upon Gemini 1.5 Flash with enhanced quality at comparable speeds. It is positioned as an upgrade path for Gemini 1.5 Flash users seeking better quality and for Gemini 1.5 Pro users who require lower latency.

02

Capabilities

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts text, images, audio, and video inputs within a 1,048,576-token context window and produces text outputs up to 8,192 tokens; image outputs are experimental as of the card's publication date. It scores 77.6% on MMLU-Pro, 90.9% on MATH, 60.1% on GPQA Diamond, 71.7% on MMMU, and 29.9% on SimpleQA, outperforming Gemini 1.5 Pro on most of these benchmarks. The model also supports a Multimodal Live API enabling low-latency bidirectional voice and video interaction, and shows improvements in coding, complex instruction following, and function calling.

03

Evaluation methodology

Gemini 2.0 Flash was evaluated against a suite of public performance benchmarks, with results compared directly to Gemini 1.5 Flash, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite. Internal safety evaluations during training report scores as absolute percentage change relative to Gemini 1.5 Pro 002, where a decrease indicates reduced violation rates and a positive increase in tone indicates improvement. Assurance evaluations use held-out prompt sets, kept separate from the model team, to prevent overfitting and preserve their value for release decision-making.

04

Safety testing

Safety evaluation included human red teaming by specialist teams, automated red teaming at scale, assurance evaluations conducted by teams outside the model development group, and Frontier Safety Framework (FSF) evaluations per Google DeepMind's FSF. Google DeepMind's Responsibility and Safety Council (RSC) reviewed ethics and safety assessments and made release decisions. Automated safety results versus Gemini 1.5 Pro 002 show text-to-text safety at -1.0% (lower violations), multilingual safety at -1.0%, and image-to-text at +1.50%, indicating a small regression in that modality, though overall violation rates remained low. The card does not report specific CBRN, cyber, or autonomy-risk evaluation results.

05

Mitigations

Safety and responsibility mitigations were applied across the full training and deployment lifecycle. These include dataset filtering, conditional pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning from human and critic feedback, safety policies and desiderata, and product-level safety filtering. The Gemini 2.0 family displays lower violation rates across most modalities than Gemini 1.5 Pro, which was itself described as a significant improvement over Gemini 1.0.

06

Deployment and access

Gemini 2.0 Flash is generally available (GA) as of the card's publication date. It is accessible via Google's Gemini API and is intended for real-time streaming and daily task use cases. The card does not specify a license type or explicit access restrictions beyond Google's standard content policies.

07

Limitations

The card flags hallucinations, limited causal understanding, complex logical deduction, and counterfactual reasoning as known general limitations of the model. The knowledge cutoff date is June 2024. The main identified safety limitations are over-refusals — where the model refuses answering benign prompts — and a refusal tone that can still come across as "preachy," though tone has improved relative to Gemini 1.5.

08

What's new

Gemini 2.0 Flash introduces refined architectural design and novel optimization methods on top of the sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer used in Gemini 1.5, yielding improvements in training stability and computational efficiency. The Multimodal Live API, enabling low-latency bidirectional voice and video interactions, is new to this generation. Experimental image output capability is introduced, not present in Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Generated by Claude sonnet from the cleaned source on Apr 23, 2026. Passages in double quotes are verbatim from the source; other text is neutral paraphrase. For citation, use the original: original document · source SHA eabe54ac211f.

Extracted Evaluations(58 results)

Sort by:0/58 rows fully reproducible (0%)
BenchmarkCategoryStateScoreSetupSource
/ v5
codingscored
34.5
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ v5
codingscored
34.2
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ v5
codingscored
30.7
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ v5
codingscored
28.9
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ global_lite
knowledgescored
83.4%
accuracy
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
/ global_lite
knowledgescored
80.8%
accuracy
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
/ global_lite
knowledgescored
78.2%
accuracy
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
77.6%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
75.8%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ global_lite
knowledgescored
73.7%
accuracy
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
71.6%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ pro
knowledgescored
67.3%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
90.9%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
86.8%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
86.5%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
mathscored
77.9%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
84.6
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
83.6
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
82.9
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
MRCR/ 1m
otherscored
82.6
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
80.0
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
MRCR/ 1m
otherscored
71.9
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
EgoSchema/ test
otherscored
71.2
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
EgoSchema/ test
otherscored
71.1
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
MRCR/ 1m
otherscored
70.5
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
EgoSchema/ test
otherscored
67.2
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
EgoSchema/ test
otherscored
66.8
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
HiddenMath
otherscored
63.5
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
Bird-SQL/ dev
otherscored
58.7
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
MRCR/ 1m
otherscored
58.0
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
Bird-SQL/ dev
otherscored
57.4
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
HiddenMath
otherscored
55.3
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
Bird-SQL/ dev
otherscored
54.4
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
HiddenMath
otherscored
52.0
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
HiddenMath
otherscored
47.2
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
Bird-SQL/ dev
otherscored
45.6
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
CoVoST2/ 21_lang
otherscored
40.1
bleu
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
CoVoST2/ 21_lang
otherscored
39.0
bleu
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
CoVoST2/ 21_lang
otherscored
38.4
bleu
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
CoVoST2/ 21_lang
otherscored
37.4
bleu
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
otherscored
29.9
accuracy
no-toolsinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
24.9
accuracy
no-toolsinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
21.7
accuracy
no-toolsinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
8.6
accuracy
no-toolsinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
1.5
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
1.5
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
0.0
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
-1.0
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
otherscored
-1.0
accuracy
Averageinstruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: method
self-reported
Frontier Safety Framework
othermentioned
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
60.1%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
59.1%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
51.5%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
/ diamond
reasoningscored
51.0%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
visionscored
71.7%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
visionscored
68.0%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
visionscored
65.9%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported
visionscored
62.3%
accuracy
instruction-tunedmissing: shot countmissing: methodmissing: language
self-reported